PRESUMED GUILTY:MOORISH AMERICAN DOC SAGA

The year was 1997. New York City was more than five years away from the devastation and destruction of the World Trade Center.

Yet, brewing inside the New York City Department of Investigation (DOI) was a hysteria that would that would erupt into an insidious disease: the paranoia that New York City Department of Corrections (DOC) employees who had adopted the Moorish-American religion (also referred to as the “Beys” and “Els”) posed a “security threat” or a “security concern” to that Department.

Incredibly, despite the Bill of Rights and individual liberties embodied in the freedom of religion, freedom of association, freedom of speech and due process, among other things, members of the Moorish American religion were accused of posing a “security concern” to the DOC merely because of their membership in the Moorish Nation. Meritless accusations that Moorish Americans posed a security concern resulted in the recommendation of discharge for at least 22 DOC employees despite their long and faithful service to the Department and, in some cases, despite their honorable discharges from branches of the United States military. At least 18 employees were fired. DOC Moorish Americans were presumed guilty of engaging in unlawful conduct without an ounce of proof in the name of “security concerns.”

More than 10 years have passed since the DOC snatched hardworking corrections officers from their posts, without warning, suspended them for 30 days without pay and ultimately fired them. December 2007 marked the 10 year anniversary of a dark point in the history of New York City’s public employees.

The union to whom these officers paid dues to protect their rights, the Correction Officers Benevolent Association (COBA) readily sacrificed them on the altar of this, the new McCarthyism. Basic constitutional rights were trampled upon and discarded. As new allegations of termination for mere association have recently surfaced in news reports, it is appropriate to review the real story behind the case of the “Beys” and “Els.”

Many readers will recall the infamous “tax fraud” investigation into City employees led by the Department of Investigations (DOI). In April 1996, the DOI received a tip that numerous DOC employees submitted federal and state tax forms to the DOC claiming “99” exemptions in an effort to avoid paying income taxes. The practice of submitting tax forms to the DOC claiming 99 exemptions was nothing new. Since at least 1991, DOC employees regularly claimed “99” or “exempt” on tax forms submitted to the DOC Payroll Department.

Then-Inspector General, Michael Caruso, spearheaded an investigation of DOC employees to determine whether corrections employees had engaged in misconduct with respect to tax documentation submitted in connection with their City employment. A check of the payroll management system showed that 1,214 DOC employees had supplied the Department with what Caruso determined to be “false tax information,” that is, tax forms claiming “99", “exempt”, or exempt because of “foreign status”, including but not limited to disgraced former Correction department Commissioner Bernard Kerik’s lover, Jeannette Pinero and Moorish American employees. The tax documents submitted by the “Bey” and “Els” were never processed by the DOC Personnel Division.

Then, around July 12, 1996, Caruso read a fax from the New York Police Department (NYPD) concerning individuals with “Moorish National” license plates. The NYPD bulletin claimed, among other things, that members “of the Detective Bureau should use extreme caution and remain on alert when making car stops or when interacting with these individuals. Members of a group, known as ‘The Great Seal Association of Moorish Affairs’, have been previously arrested and are suspected of armed robberies and trafficking in high-powered automatic weapons.”

Members of the service were also advised to be alert to individuals that express “anti-government rhetoric,” and that these individuals should be reported to the intelligence division. The NYPD bulletin did not contain any information which could be independently verified. For example, the memorandum did not say when the car stop occurred; it did not name a single individual involved in the car stop; it did not state the name of anyone associated with the Great Seal who had been arrested and when they were arrested, and for what reason; and, it did not name anyone suspected of “armed robberies and trafficking in high-powered automatic weapons” who were associated with the Great Seal or the Moorish Nation. Finally, the NYPD bulletin did not identify the individual in the car stop as a law enforcement or corrections employee.

Despite the absence of credible information, widespread constitutional abuses engulfed the DOI’s efforts to ferret out Moorish Americans from the DOC’s ranks. The DOC, under the direction of the DOI, launched a policy to “get rid of the Moors.” Records were kept of employees who identified themselves as Moorish American. Beginning in mid-1995, DOC employees who had adopted the Moorish American faith advised the Department of that fact, by submitting “name change” forms and the supporting documents to formally use their Moorish names on DOC documents.

DOI staffers intensively searched through those documents and created a list of all DOC employees identified as “Moorish American.” DOI employees scoured filed lawsuits to determine who was claiming to be Moorish American. Pedigree sheets added “Moorish Nation member” as intelligence information. Terms such as “security risk,” “security threat,” and “security concern” were whispered and repeated.

Indiscriminate use of dubious “informers,” wiretapping, surveillance, neighborhood snooping and a sting operation of the Moorish Temple was employed. In their quest to obtain information, even DOC employees who were not members of the Moorish Nation were wiretapped.

Despite the covert operations, Caruso did not obtain evidence that any of the Moorish Americans now fighting in this litigation had been suspected of armed robberies or that they trafficked in automatic weapons. The investigation did not uncover information to show that the fired Moorish Americans organized or committed armed robberies or possessed the proceeds of armed robberies.

In short, Caruso could not prove that the targeted Moorish Americans had anything at all to do with the allegations in the NYPD bulletin. And, yet, because of their mere membership with the Moorish religion, Caruso hatched a plan to eliminate these employees from the DOC. Former DOC Commissioners Michael Jacobson, Bernard Kerik and William Fraser did not take a single step to remedy the flagrant constitutional abuses occurring under their noses.

Among other things, they were grossly negligent in supervising subordinates who committed the violations and were deliberately indifferent to the rights of the “Beys” and “Els.” The late Edward Kuriansky simply allowed Caruso to run amok in the DOI. Union officials provided inadequate representation, if any. Steven Issacs, at the time a union attorney, informed Caruso’s office of the activities of union members in the United States Constitutional Task Force, including “other unnamed,” dues-paying “Beys.”

Eventually, the Department of Taxation and Finance identified 85 individuals for arrest. Significantly, of the remaining 1,000-plus DOC employees not arrested, Caruso’s office wrote memoranda of complaints against only the 23 correction personnel who had submitted paperwork claiming exemption from tax withholding based on their membership in the Moorish Nation. DOC personnel not identified with the Moorish Nation but who nonetheless had submitted paperwork claiming exemption from tax withholding based on other theories, that is, they were “non-resident aliens,” immune/exempt from taxation, and not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and/or the State of New York, or some combination of these claims, were ignored until two years after the tax investigation closed in July 1999. Even then, the DOC did not demand their discharge.

On December 3, 1997, Caruso recommended the summary suspension and termination of the Moorish American employees based upon his receipt of the NYPD bulletin and the documents they submitted to the DOC to support their name change. But, these individuals were merely told that they were being suspended and ultimately charged for misconduct based upon their submission of “false tax information” to the NYC DOC. The fired Moorish Americans were never told that the NYPD bulletin played a role in the selective treatment they received. Caruso admits that Moorish Americans were not told that the NYPD bulletin was one of the factors considered in suspending and terminating them.

Before their discharge, these individuals were never told that they posed a “security risk,” a “security concern,” or a “security threat.” They were entitled to receive a presumption of innocence rather than to bear the presumption of guilt. No one from the DOI or the DOC ever interviewed them about the NYPD bulletin or submission of their tax documents. The presumption of guilt was manifested in a modified duty assignment in a rodent infested, abandoned building without co-worker contact. Indeed, co-workers, fueled by Caruso’s hysteria, ridiculed the “Beys” and the “Els” by writing “99 Club/Muslim” on locker room walls. Formal complaints were lodged. DOC officials never investigated the matter. DOC friends were terrorized into severing all ties to “the Beys” and “Els.”

The conduct of Caruso, the DOI and the DOC, among others, attached a negative stigma to the targeted Moorish Americans and destroyed family and personal associations not to mention professional careers. Their ultimate termination entailed serious economic consequences. Comparable employment has been impossible to find. The wheels of justice have been grinding slowly in this case. The City defendants are expected to use every avenue available under the rules of legal procedure to grind those wheels even slower, wreaking economic, psychological and emotional havoc.

One of the greatest travesties of justice in the “Beys’” ordeal was the lack of procedural due process – being the victim of a vicious whisper campaign by a faceless accuser spewing baseless charges. These former corrections employees never received an explanation of the real evidence against them, the NYPD memorandum, nor did they have an opportunity to respond to the baseless accusation.

An equally despicable travesty was the encroachment upon the right to freedom of association for the “Beys” and “Els” because of their adoption of the Moorish American religion. One of man’s most precious liberties is his or her right to work. When a person is deprived of this right by the defendants’ clinging to hysterical, unfounded accusations based solely on a person’s religious associations and by the silence of those who know the truth lest they be smeared and attacked, “presumed guilty” may become the norm.

"Speaking Truth To Power."

CONSPIRACY:TOP JAPANESE SENATOR SAYS 9-11 WAS INSIDE JOB

Conspiracy: Japanese Senator Says 9/11 Was Inside Job…

Source : Japanese Times

As we get closer to the end of George H.W. Bush’s failed presidency, we will be hearing alot more chatter about the Iraq War and conspiracies concerning the 9/11 attacks. Japanese senator Yukihisa Fujita has stated his case that he believes that the “U.S. government either allowed 9/11 to happen, or played some role in the destruction wrought that day.”

He makes a case for his theory and lays some pretty strong arguements that he gained from watching numerous videos and reading books from people stateside who have touted that the official 9/11 story is bogus. This a must read:

“Last year I watched more videos and read books written by professor David Ray Griffin (a professor emeritus of philosophy of religion and theology at Claremont Graduate University who wrote the most famous Truth Movement book, ‘The New Pearl Harbor’) about things such as the collapse of World Trade Center No. 7. This building, which was never hit by an airplane, collapsed straight down. Between the videos showing the way it fell, and the numerous reports of explosions, many are convinced that this building was demolished.”

Fujita urges the Bush administration to put the issue to rest simply by showing videos that show the plane that hit the Pentagon. Instead, only a few grainy images have been released to the public. More disconcertingly, many videos taken by surrounding businesses were confiscated by the FBI immediately after the Pentagon explosion.

The Pennsylvania crash, like the Pentagon explosion, also yielded virtually no recognizable plane parts at the crash site. Rather, small pieces of debris were found up to 10 km away. The official story — that the plane “vaporized” when it hit the ground — is inconsistent with the evidence left by every other plane crash in the history of aviation.

Full story after the cut….

In a September 2003 article for The Guardian newspaper, Michael Meacher, who served as Tony Blair’s environment minister from May 1997 to June 2003, shocked the establishment by calling the global war on terrorism “bogus.” Even more controversially, he implied that the U.S. government either allowed 9/11 to happen, or played some role in the destruction wrought that day. Besides Meacher, few politicians have publicly questioned America’s official 9/11 narrative — until Diet member Yukihisa Fujita.

In January 2008 Fujita, a member of the Democratic Party of Japan, asked the Japanese Parliament and Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda to explain gaping holes in the official 9/11 story that various groups — including those who call themselves the “911 Truth Movement” — claim to have exposed.

Fujita, along with a growing number of individuals — including European and American politicians — are leading a charge to conduct a thorough, independent investigation of what happened on Sept. 11, 2001.

“Three or four years ago I saw some Internet videos like ‘Loose Change’ and ‘911 In Plane Site’ and I began to ask questions,” Fujita said in an interview, “but I still couldn’t believe this was done by anyone but al-Qaida.

“Last year I watched more videos and read books written by professor David Ray Griffin (a professor emeritus of philosophy of religion and theology at Claremont Graduate University who wrote the most famous Truth Movement book, ‘The New Pearl Harbor’) about things such as the collapse of World Trade Center No. 7. This building, which was never hit by an airplane, collapsed straight down. Between the videos showing the way it fell, and the numerous reports of explosions, many are convinced that this building was demolished.”

Fujita’s presentation to the Diet and Fukuda focused a great deal on yet another aspect of 9/11 that now quite a few around the world find extremely suspicious: the Pentagon crash.

“I don’t think (a) 767 could have hit the Pentagon,” Fujita reckons. “There is no evidence of the plane itself. Almost nothing identifiable was left on the lawn or inside. The official story says the entire plane disintegrated, but the jet engines in particular were very strong (two 6-ton titanium steel turbine engines). And the damage to the building is much smaller than the size of the supposed airplane. The official claims just don’t fit the facts.”

While some label that claim “wacky” and label critics of the official 9/11 story “conspiracy theorists,” Fujita has impressive company. For one, former Maj. Gen. Albert Stubblebine, who was commanding general of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security until 1984, is quoted on the “Patriots Question 911″ Web site as saying, “I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole.’

“So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What’s going on?”

Fujita urges the Bush administration to put the issue to rest simply by showing videos that show the plane that hit the Pentagon. Instead, only a few grainy images have been released to the public. More disconcertingly, many videos taken by surrounding businesses were confiscated by the FBI immediately after the Pentagon explosion.

The Pennsylvania crash, like the Pentagon explosion, also yielded virtually no recognizable plane parts at the crash site. Rather, small pieces of debris were found up to 10 km away. The official story — that the plane “vaporized” when it hit the ground — is inconsistent with the evidence left by every other plane crash in the history of aviation.

Plane crashes always yield plane fragments, Fujita explained, which can be identified by the plane’s serial number, but that’s not the case for the four planes which crashed on 9/11. Strangely, the U.S. government managed to produce passports and DNA samples of individuals killed, but no identifiable plane parts. In an online article entitled “Physics 911,” 34-year U.S. Air Force veteran Col. George Nelson notes, “It seems . . . that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view.”

Fujita has largely relied on the voluminous amount of video and written material published in books and on the Internet, including the “Patriots Question 911″ site, on which hundreds of allegations are leveled against the official story by senior officials from the military, intelligence services, law enforcement, and government, as well as pilots, engineers, architects, firefighters and others.

While not many other Japanese have taken an interest in this story, a few notable individuals besides Fujita have disputed the U.S. government’s version, including Akira Dojimaru, a Japanese writer living in Spain. In his book, written in Japanese, “The Anatomy of the WTC Collapses: Flaws in the U.S. Government’s Account,” he uses photos, drawings and blueprints of the WTC buildings to back up his claim that buildings one and two could not have fallen in the manner they fell due to the plane crashes and subsequent fires. “And even if it was conceivable that they could fall due to the damage that day,” Dojimaru wrote in an e-mail, “they never would have collapsed horizontally, and would have scattered steel beams and smashed concrete much farther than 100 meters.”

For Fujita, it was Dojimaru’s meticulous research, combined with the aforementioned Web sites, that convinced him the official story was nothing more than a house of cards.

One book that Fujita found unconvincing was the “9/11 Commission Report.”

“The head of the 9/11 Commission is close with (U.S. Secretary of State) Condoleezza Rice and (Vice President Dick) Cheney. One commission member (Sen. Max Cleland) resigned, saying the White House did not disclose enough information.”

On Democracy Now’s radio show in March 2004, Cleland even went as far as to say, “This White House wants to cover it (the facts of 9/11) up.”

More recently, a New York Times article in January quoted Thomas Kean, the chairman of the 9/11 Commission, as saying that “the CIA destroyed videotaped interrogations of Qaeda operatives,” and concluded that that “obstructed our investigation.”

Following the lead of Fujita, Karen Johnson, a conservative Republican senator from Arizona, has publicly voiced her doubts about 9/11 before the U.S. Senate. Inspired by Blair Gadsby — who on May 27 started a hunger strike to bring attention to the 911 Truth Movement — Johnson, like Fujita, is encouraging politicians to conduct a thorough, independent investigation.

Fujita, who worked for more than 20 years for the international conflict resolution NGO group MRA and the Japanese Association for Aid and Relief (AAR), has become something of a global cause celebre since his extraordinary questioning at the Diet. In February 2008, he participated in a conference at the European Parliament led by EMP Guilietto Chiesa calling for an independent commission of inquiry into 9/11. While in Europe, he met with NGOs from 11 European countries to discuss 9/11.

One month later Fujita spoke at the “Truth Now” conference in Sydney, Australia. One focus of these meetings was the Italian documentary “ZERO,” whose release will mark the first time the 9/11 movement’s message has moved from the “cyberworld” to public venues. Fujita has also spoken about his 9/11 doubts on two U.S. radio shows, one hosted by Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul, and another by Alex Jones of infowars.com.

He is also making ripples in Japan. Fujita was featured in a March 2 article by well-known critic Takao Iwami on “How to deal with doubts about 9/11″ in the Sunday Mainichi weekly. He was also featured in a March 26 Spa! magazine piece headlined, “European conference discusses 9/11 doubts.”

However, not everyone is enthralled with Fujita’s bold line of questioning.

“One person showed strong anger towards me,” Fujita noted, “and another (Japanese person) threatened my life. A few others advised me to be extremely careful.”

Still, Fujita says, the vast majority — around 95 percent — have been positive.

“One man said, ‘You’re a true samurai.’ Another man came all the way from Okayama in western Japan to thank me personally. And among other Parliament members, I received only words of encouragement and support.”

While in Europe, Fujita met British former MP Meacher, who dared to question the official story when it was still considered gospel. Time, the Iraq war and well-sourced online videos are emboldening many people, including politicians, to step out of the cyberworld and voice their doubts in newspapers, magazines, theaters, and — most importantly — government chambers.

“Now Blair is gone, and Bush will soon be gone,” Meacher told Fujita. “Our time is coming.”

ARE THE TERMS SPANISH, LATINO, WEST INDIAN, AFRICAN AMERICAN, BLACK MODERN DAY SLAVE BRANDS??

Post by MOORISH BROOKLYN INTELLIGENCE 360° ▲Λ۞♂∞∩╪☼

All which are SLAVE labels of the original inhabitants people of the planet earth. Popularly known as melaninated, original people, Asiatics, properly Moors globally. The Aboriginal Indigenous people of the ENTIRE planet earth, not just 1 out of 7.



If you take the letter “A” and take the line out of the middle of the letter “A”, you would get a figure resembling a pyramid. Now you will know why all the continents start with the letter “A”. Americas (North, Central, South America and the Caribbean islands), Africa (south Asia), Asia (North Asia, including Europe), Australia, Antarctica. All start with “A”, why, because we were everywhere and had pyramids on all of them. Star Gate the show shows you we have pyramids there. Aliens vs Predator shows you we have pyramids there.





What do your oppressors, the pale Shriner and masons whose tassel is tied down to one side knows that you don’t know?


So let’s clean it up, so our DNA can unlock. So we can go back into our true history before our pale children, known as so called Europeans, proper children of Rome, pale nations pale tribes walked the earth, before continents drifts and splits.


Spanish, really mean the people born in Spain and their descendents should not be confused with a language, which is really deriving from Latin.

Latinos, really dealing with those whose descended from those who speak Latin or just basically people who speak Latin. So it’s describing a language of a group of people really.




West Indian, no real such thing. As an intelligent person we should ask where are the North Indians, South Indians and East Indians? Just simple questions. The word Indian comes from a word that means dark in hue, dark pigmentation. When attached to a group of people its “describing” their skin color, pigmentation. We are actually different “shades” of “olive”. The high science and clarity brought to us from our brother Noble Drew Ali.



Look at your eyebrow color in the mirror, then look at your skin hue, and see if you’re black. Think real, Real, REAL hard.


African American, no such thing. We are talking about 3 continents, 4 specific regions of the earth. Africa, the modern name and North, Central, South America and the adjacent islands known as the Caribbean islands. There is no flag for the Caribbean, but there are individual tribal banners so called island flags. In the UN there is no representative for Africa, there are over 50 nations there. There is no difference between Jamaica and Chicago, no difference between Haiti and New Jersey. Why, Jurisdiction and territory possession, or real estate. Look up “Common Wealth”, the old name is British Empire. Did not the so call controversial Vodka Ad that should that our territory was the majority of North America until we were defeated and government became corrupted.




Check out USA vs US on Gogle. com.

and watch the video again: http://www. youtube. com/watch?v=0Oi7JEObPVA

Black, no such person or people. A word that was “adopted”, “attached” to a group of people like the other words which all can be traced back to the 16 and 15 century, the times of war, oppression and imprisoning of the Moors globally. Starting with defeating of the Moors in the east in Spain. Black is also an adjective.


What is an Adjective?

The word Blackamoor is in the dictionary. It is a compound word Black + Moor.

Why is it in the dictionary?

We went from Moor, to Blackamoor to Black.


We have many tribal names, many tribal names. However we had one global Nationality.



What other flag you know on the planet goes back to 10,000 to 50,000 years ago?

That flag is a red flag with a five pointed green star in the middle. Known as old glory, the Masonic story of the chopping down of the cherry tree by George Washington.




Now we can understand why the pyramid with the all Seeing Eye, which is confused with groups of the pale nation and pale tribes who are using it and have adopted it.






Who build mound pyramids and solid material pyramids?

Why are we the only government with two seal?

One represents the pale nations, the pale tribes, children of Rome which is the eagle, which is really a Phoenix.

Who does the Pyramid represent?

In a Black’s law Dictionary, in the front inside cover it starts out by stating “Black’s Law Dictionary – Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern”.

What do they mean by Ancient?

What do they mean by Ancient in the Law Dictionary?

We have search for truth and ourselves in ancient civilizations, under the water, inside the earth, on walls, caves and in Scriptures even seen our face on Mars. The last place we look for ourselves is in LAW. We have been oppressed so much by it we think it has nothing to do with us.



If most of our people are 3/5 of a man, what is the other 2/5 that is missing?

How can you go from a second class to first class since you can by Law?

How do you go from being a Minor, Minority to Major or a Majority since you can in Law?

Make sure your logic, common sense, knowledge (an accumulation of “facts”) is not overridden by emotions and over 500 years of brainwashing.

GORE VIDAL:100 YEARS TO RECOVER FROM BUSH

Madrid - It will take the United States a century to recover from the damage wreaked by President George. W Bush, US writer Gore Vidal said in an interview published on Saturday.

"The president behaved like a virtual criminal but we didn't have the courage to sack him for fear of violating the American constitution," Vidal told the El Mundo newspaper.

The author, a trenchant critic of the US-led invasion of Iraq, said it would take the United States "100 years to repair the damage" caused by Bush.

"We live in a dictatorship. We have a fascist government ...which controls the media," he said.

Vidal also said presidential aspirant Barack Obama was "intelligent" adding that it would be a "novelty" to have an "intelligent" person in the White House.

CHINA STATE PAPER CAST'S DOUBT ON OBAMA "CHANGE" PLATFORM

China's state-run People's Daily Monday cast doubt on Barack Obama's ability to bring change if elected US president, in a commentary that gave a rare insight into the Chinese government's thinking.

The report in the overseas edition of the newspaper -- the mouthpiece of the Communist Party -- also said Obama's emergence as Democratic Party candidate for the US presidential elections did not challenge racial divisions.

"Obama has not broken through white America's feeling of superiority, on the contrary, his emergence has reinforced that feeling," said the comment, which was written by the paper's senior editor.

China has so far been publicly mute about the US presidential elections -- due in November -- in an effort to remain neutral.

But the comment piece in Monday's People's Daily gave a small glimpse into the Communist Party's thoughts on the US elections after Obama clinched the Democratic Party nomination from rival Hillary Clinton.

Obama has campaigned on a platform for radical change in the US, but the newspaper downplayed his ability to bring about transformation if he was elected.

It took Obama's staunch anti-Iraq war stance as an example, saying questions remained over how to pull troops out of the war-torn country.

"No one believes that on such a complicated issue, only relying on a firm stance can resolve things," the comment piece said.

"The same problem exists for changes in the economy, social security and education."

The paper also pointed to Obama's inexperience compared to rival Republican Party candidate John McCain.

"To borrow a phrase used in Clinton and Obama's campaigns, maybe one can describe the feelings that voters might encounter: Everyone imagine for a moment the person who picks up the red phone at 3am in the morning in the White House -- if it's McCain, they will be at ease."

Experts say China's leaders have traditionally preferred Republican presidents over Democratic ones, partly because they tend to focus less on rights issues.